2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting

Purpose

To elicit participant feedback regarding the 2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting.

Executive Summary

The 2020 Spring CTSA Program Meeting took place on April 14- 15, 2020, via Zoom, due to the COVID-19 outbreak. At the conclusion of the meeting, registered attendees were sent an individualized unique survey link to complete the 2020 Spring Program Meeting Logistics evaluation, regardless of whether or not they attended. Additionally, two follow-up reminder emails were sent to individuals who had not responded.

Registered attendees were asked questions about their overall experience attending the Program Meeting and then were asked to indicate which individual meetings they had attended. Respondents were then directed to a survey queue to complete evaluations for each individual meeting they attended. The Program Meeting Logistics evaluation was sent to 555 registered attendees, 145 of them had attended the 2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting held on April 15, 2020.

A total of 49 of the 145 participants completed the 2020 Program Meeting Logistics evaluation and had indicated that they had attended the Common Metric Initiative Meeting, with a response rate of 33.8%. However, of the 49 respondents, only 27 of them went on to complete the 2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative evaluation. The meeting included NCATS and CLIC Common Metrics updates, and discussions regarding the consortium impact metrics.

All respondents “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences (N=27). The majority of respondents “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the topics presented at the meeting were valuable (96.3%, N=26), that the meeting addressed expectations (88.4%, N=23), and that the meeting helped clarify the priorities for the Common Metrics Initiative group going into 2020 (80.8%, N=21). Despite the difficulties presented in shifting the meeting to an entirely virtual format, 96.1% (N=25) of respondents were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the meeting overall.

This was supported in the qualitative feedback, where individuals expressed their satisfaction that the meeting was allowed to continue as planned, “Great meeting! Informative and engaging. Great work.”

Distributed Date
Files

Please log in to access this content

Instrument Fields
Order Instrument Field
1

The Program Hub Communicators Meeting covered topics I found valuable.

2

The Program Hub Communicators Meeting addressed my expectations.

3

The Program Hub Communicators Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.

4

I understand the next steps for the Program Hub Communicators group moving forward in 2020.

5

Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2020 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or smartphone/tablet.

6

Please provide an overall rating of the 2020 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting.
(1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)

7

What topics would you like to discuss at a future in-person Program Hub Communicators Meeting?

8

What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find most useful?

9

What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find least useful?

10

What aspects of the Program Hub Communicators Meeting were particularly helpful?

11

What aspects of future Program Hub Communicators Meetings would you change?

12

Please provide any additional feedback on the Program Hub Communicators Meeting below.

13

The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting covered topics I found valuable.

14

The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting addressed my expectations.

15

The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences

16

I understand the next steps for the Common Metrics Initiative group moving forward in 2020.

17

Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or smartphone/tablet.

18

Please provide an overall rating of the 2020 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting.
(1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)

19

What topics would you like to discuss at a future in-person Common Metrics Initiative Meeting?

20

What Common Metrics Initiative Meeting content did you find most useful?


Submitted by Jacqueline Attia on Fri, 06/05/2020 - 13:31