CMI 2016 Hub Report Feedback Survey

Purpose

To gather feedback on the 2016 Common Metric Report in an effort to improve future reports.

Executive Summary

The Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC) distributed the first Common Metrics Hub Reports on August 24, 2018 based on the 2016 data for the 3 metrics: Median IRB Review Duration, Pilot Funding Publications, and Careers in Clinical and Translational Research. Reports to the hubs included hub-specific data relative to de-identified data for the consortium as a whole for each metric. A completely de-identified report was sent to NCATS with data on metrics consortium-wide.

Subsequent to the release of the reports, the CLIC developed and sent a survey to each of the hubs. The survey was designed to solicit feedback regarding the usefulness of each of the report sections and to obtain suggestions for improving future reports. The survey was released to hubs on September 7, 2018. Data was collected through the end of business on September 27, 2018.

Surveys were sent, via email, to individuals at each hub who received the Common Metrics Hub Report (principal investigators, administrators and evaluators). Those receiving the survey were instructed that they they did not need to coordinate their survey responses as there was no limit to the number of surveys that could be submitted by each hub.

A total of 95 surveys were received from 60 unique hubs. This report summarizes both quantitative and qualitative results found during analysis. A qualitative review of the comments in each open ended section was conducted. Comments were categorized into major themes. A summary of all responses is detailed below.

Distributed Date
Files

Please log in to access this content

Instrument Fields
Order Instrument Field
1

Email/Contact Information (OPTIONAL)

2

Hub Name

3

Please specify your hub if it was not listed.

4

What is your primary role in the hub?

5

Please specify your role if it was was not listed.

6

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Executive Summary.

7

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Violin Graphs (univariate analysis).

8

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Spider Plots (qualitative analysis).

9

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Scatter Plots (bivariate analysis).

10

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Dendrogram.

11

In the Hub report, please indicate how useful the following section is: Appendix (Analyzing the Turn-The-Curve Data).

12

Please indicate how valuable the inter-hub comparisons of your hub to other hubs were for: Median IRB Review Duration Metric.

13

Please provide additional comments regarding the value of the Median IRB Review Duration Metric comparisons.

14

Please indicate how valuable the inter-hub comparisons of your hub to other hubs were for: Pilot Funding Publications Metric.

15

Please provide additional comments regarding the value of the Pilot Funding Publications Metric comparisons.

16

Please indicate how valuable the inter-hub comparisons of your hub to other hubs were for: Careers in Clinical and Translational Research Metric

17

Please provide additional comments regarding the value of the Careers in Clinical and Translational Research Metric comparisons.

18

Has your hub discussed the report/findings with your hub metric team(s)?

19

Please provide additional comments regarding discussing the report/findings with your hub metric team(s).

20

Has your hub discussed the report/findings with NCATS leadership?


Submitted by Laura Hassinger on Fri, 02/28/2020 - 12:34