- Main navigation
- CLIC & The CTSA Program
- News & Events
- Groups
- Common Metrics Initiative
- Education & Career Development
- Team Science & Collaboration
- Resources
- CTSA Program Projects & Initiatives
- Contact
- Search
The Program Evaluation and Continuous Improvement Manager performs a full range of professional duties including leading and managing multiple and diverse assignments, with a primary focus on conducting quality improvement and program evaluation activities, managing and maintaining the systems and processes, and directing/leading staff to support these activities within the MCCCC Cancer Research
What is the real-world impact of our network? That is a question the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program has been trying to answer since its inception. Over the past four years, the Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration has pitched in on that effort, knitting together several tried and trusted evaluation methods to develop a new Stakeholder-Engaged Research Impact
Government, non-profits, and organizations fund research with the ultimate goal of improving health and society. Yet measuring these long-term outcomes can be challenging, and research impact has traditionally been tied to quantitative productivity, like bibliometrics and grant funding, and not necessarily the broader impacts of research. For years, researchers lacked a cohesive framework to
In a new study, the Evaluation and Continuous Improvement (ECI) team of the Georgia CTSA evaluated publications characterized as Big Splashes with immediate impact and publications with Ripple Effects over time, to understand how Georgia CTSA-supported research is ‘making waves’ that can accelerate translation. Previous systematic evaluations of the Georgia CTSA’s publication portfolio revealed a
Introduction: The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium, about 60 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported CTSA hubs at academic health care institutions nationwide, is charged with improving the clinical and translational research enterprise.
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Lifespan Integration DTF Face-to-Face Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 CTSA Informatics Community Face-to-Face Meeting.
This video provides a brief overview of sampling constructs in qualitative research.
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Spring Collaboration and Engagement Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Spring Career Professional Development for CTSA Workforce Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Spring Methods and Processes Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Spring Common Metrics Meeting
To elicit participant feedback on the 2019 Fall CTSA Program Meeting, including the Poster Session & Networking Meeting, the Administrator’s Meeting, and the full Program Meeting.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research initiative, funded by the NIH Common Fund and offered through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, developed more than 60 unique models for achieving the NIH goal of accelerating discoveries toward better public health.
The purpose of the article is to describe the progress of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program to address the evaluation-related recommendations made by the 2013 Institute of Medicine's review of the CTSA Program and guidelines published in CTS Journal the same year (Trochim et al., Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(4): 303-309).
We evaluated how regulatory support services provided by University of Illinois at Chicago's Center for Clinical and Translational Science may reduce Institutional Review Board (IRB) turnaround times. IRB applications were categorized by receipt of any regulatory support and amount of support received.
The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program was designed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop processes and infrastructure for clinical and translational research throughout the United States. The CTSA initiative now funds 61 institutions.
Evaluators have strongly felt that more strategic approach to CTSA Evaluation is needed. The authors recognize the need to have a guiding document that can be used for the entire consortium. In late 2017 a group of evaluators formed the Clinical and Translational Sciences Awards (CTSA) Evaluation Guidelines Workgroup, co-chaired by Tanha Patel (Wake Forest) and Julie Rainwater, PhD (University of